A new Colorado bill that gives the governor broad power to spend dollars from taxpayers against possible actions of the Trump administration authorized a great obstacle this week.
HB25-1321, also known as “support against the federal action of the advertiser”, will allocate $ 4 million from the State Infrastructure Infrastructure Fund as a safeguard against possible federal reprisals on state laws that challenge President Trump’s Executive.
According to the language of the bill, the governor’s office could use the fund to hire lawyers or contractors to respond to federal decisions that affect subsidies, contracts or funds sent to Colorado. It also covers legal costs for any state employment that faces federal investigations or a relationship of demands with its official tariffs.
Worried parents of trans children compared to ‘hate groups’ by Colorado DeM: they would not ask the kkk’ for their opinion

The bill of “Support against the federal action of the advertiser” was approved by the Chamber Chamber Assignments Committee on Tuesday. (Getty images)
The bill was approved by the Assignments Committee of the House of Representatives on Tuesday and is scheduled for the consideration of the House of Representatives. Then he will face the Senate to consult.
Colorado Democrats can be drawing a page from California’s play book, since Governor Gavin Newsom approved $ 50 million in taxpayers in February to help in legal judicial battles and protection for illegal immigrants against Trump administration.
The State Republican immediately criticized the approval of the bill, saying that on social networks the Centennial Legislature has “continuously attacked the administrator in the eye in this session and are now using our significant taxes and water to defend it.”
Colorado Democrats are ‘pushing the bear’ defuting Trump’s orders, warns the legislator of the Republican party

Capitol of the State of Colorado in Denver (John Greim/Loop Images/Universal Images Group through Getty Images)
“Four million dollars of the Investment and Infrastructure Jobs Law to give the governor a $ 4 million blank to sue the federal government, that is what we are arguing today, the Republican state representative Brandi Bradley published in X.” You can’t make these things up…. -Reads fall apart. Zerendence any money to be continuous to be appropriate, that does not expand.
The Communications Director of the Democrats of Colorado House, Jarrett Freedman, said that the bill “musk proof” of the state of “illegal and unconstitutional federal actions that threaten financing care, education, public security, our envy.”
“Trump has frozen FEMA subsidies, agricultural subsidies for Colorado farmers, behavioral health financing, emergency response financing and Republicans of the House of Representatives are encouraging everything,” he said.
Colorado Dems Ram Abortion, Bills Transgender through the limited debate of the Sunday session: ‘Unprecedented’

Donald Trump arrives at its inauguration on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC (Melina Mara – Pool/Getty Images)
In February, Trump implemented a freezing in several federal financing programs to ensure that federal financial assistance programs comply with their recent executive orders, including division, equity and inclusion programs (DEI).
But an American district judge issued a preliminary judicial order at the national level on Tuesday that ordered the administration to release billions of dollars assigned by two Biden era, the Investment Law and Infrastructure Jobs and the Inflation Reduction Law.
Colorado House Democrats recently approved a series of controversial bills that Republicans fear that Trump’s attention may attract, since some of the bills challenge their executive orders.
Click here to get the Fox News application
The bills approved in this session include SB25-183, which requires taxpayers to finance abortion services; HB25-1309, ordering insurers cover transgender procedures regardless of age; HB25-1312, which imposes mandatory gender policies in schools and considers it “coercive control” in cases of custody of children when a father does not affirm the gender identity of a child or “dies the names”; and SB25-129, which prohibits cooperation with research outside the State on transgender procedures and abortion services.