After a judge failed against him last week, prosecutors of the Office of the District Prosecutor of Los Angeles County presented a new motion to delay the Resentment Hearing of the Méndez brothers until the court can review an evaluation of the recently completed probation board.
“People request that the Court make all reasonable efforts to obtain recently completed comprehensive risk assessments of the Governor’s Office,” prosecutors said in their legal presentation. “If additional time is required to obtain thesis documents, people ask the Court to continue the Review Hearing.”
The voice of the motion of the other route of the Menéndez to Freedom brothers, a call to the clemency of California Gavin Newsom governor. At the end of February, Newsom ordered the State’s probation board to carry out an Erik and Lyle Méndez’s risk assessment as one of the first steps towards clemency.
Newsom announced that a decision will be made about the supply of the clemency of the Menéndez brothers after their Final risk assessment Audience in June.
“On June 13, both Lyle and Erik Menéndez, independently, will have their final audience,” said Newsom in their titular podcast. “That would weigh our independent analysis of whether or not to advance with the clemency application to support a switch.”
However, the DA of the County said that the Board completed the risk assessment reports on April 15.
“On April 15, 2025, people realized that the probation Board has completed their comprehensive risk assessment reports for ERIK and Lyle Menéndez,” prosecutors wrote in their legal presentation. “Although people were not ordered to reveal these reports due to the governor’s executive privilege and, for other reasons, the governor’s office has invited the court to request these documents for use at the resentment hearing.”
The district prosecutor argued that both parties have referred to previous reports duration of the procedures.
“There is no legitimate reason why the court must not possess the most current and up -to -date risk assessments before making resentment decisions in this case,” prosecutors wrote.
Erik and Lyle Menéndez were sentenced to life imprisonment without probation for the murders of their parents in 1989, Kitty and José Méndez. The brothers admitted the murders, but said they did it in self -defense, after enduring years of abuse of their parents. More than 30 years passed in custody to the previous Gives George Gascón He presented a motion in favor of reducing the sentences of the brothers and granting them eligibility for probation.
Nathan Hochman district prosecutor filed a request to withdraw the motion of his prestecessor after his office reviewed tens of thousands of judicial documents, trial transcripts, prison records and other statements. Hochman said that the previous motion of Gascón did not thoroughly consider if the brothers had tasks full responsibility for their crimes.
With that reasoning, Hochman requested that the court allow him to withdraw the motion of Gascón. However, Los Angeles County Judge Michael Jesus Denied Hochman’s requestAllowing procedures to continue on Thursday, April 17.
“These murders were calculated, premeditated and cold blood,” Hochman said in a statement after the hearing. “Our position remains clear: until the Menéndez brothers are finally cleaned with all their lies of self -defense and suborption and sticks to the subornio perjury, they did not rehabilitate and represent an unreasonable risk of danger to public security.”
After the decision, the lawyer of the brothers, Mark Geragos, thanked the judge and said: “Justice won about politics”, a statement repeated by the members of the Menéndez family by pressing the repentance of Erik and Lyle.
“Today’s failure states something that should never lead in question,” said cousin Anamaria Baralt. “The facts, justice and law are still important. The court made this process not about politics. It is about the truth. It is justice. And it is about giving people the opportunity to show who they are now, not only who are the worst moments.”
After the decision, Hochman issued a statement that disputed the statement that his request was politically motivated.
“By denying our request to withdraw the motion of resancing from the previous prosecutor, the Court rejected the argument of the Menéndez brothers that our application was based only on political winds,” recognizing that the position has followed the fact that Hochman “non -political.”
Before being his term as a district prosecutor, Mango He said that “I would not participate in delay for the good of the delay.”
“And I would like to participate in the delay for the good of the delay because this case is too important for the Méndez brothers,” Hochman said in November. “It is too important for the members of the victims’ family. It is too important for the public to delay more than necessary to make the review that people must expect from a district prosecutor.”
However, Hochman’s rhetoric with respect to the case changed in February, claiming that the song of the brothers several times lasted the investigation.
“The basics for that request is that the previous motion did not examine or considered that the Menéndez brothers have exhibited a complete vision and tasks of complete responsibility of their crimes by continuing for the past 30 years to lies,” Hochdra, Hochdra,