NewNow you can listen to Fox News articles!
President Donald Trump fulfilled the promise to fix what his predecessor broke. That is a difficult task, given the copious calamities that Joe Biden caused.
At the top of the list it was closing our southern border. Donald Trump succeeded with the speed of lightning, putting an obvious lie to Biden’s statement that the Fiat Executive could do it. The Americans cheered.
Then, Trump kicked out another promise to deport those in the United States illegally, partularly violent criminals and members of terrorist gangs. The Democrats ran to federal courts to defend the indefensible, not because they like thugs and terrorists, but because they despise Trump.
President Donald Trump and American judge James Boasberg (Getty images)
His usscrupulos trick was to buy until they found a liberal lawyer of his taste. It worked like a charm.
Democrats know that ‘judging purchases’ is anti -democratic and incorrect
The activist judges delivered resting training orders and meditative mandates such as Halloween candy. The media that hate Trump, Miope as usual, celebrated with reckless abandonment. But the confetti parade that launched was a fleeting.
In a short time, the judges of the District Court found reversals to destroy the law and abuse their authority. Everything was so predictable.
And he won stop. Every time another lawsuit appears, sometimes, it forces Trump’s Department of Justice to play an endless game of “Wack-A-Mole”.
For those who try to keep the score, here are three of the most recent cases in this popular arcade attraction.
García’s deportation case
Kilmar Abrego García was illegally in the United States, collected by the application of immigration and customs (ICE), and gave a first leg to El Salvador where he came from. Despite an early declaration of an lawyer from the department of justice had since his deportation was an “administrative error,” evidence arose otherwise.
Scotus must stop sabotage without law of the leftist judges or the Trump agenda
There is convincing evidence that Garcia is or was a member of the notorious MS-13 gang. According to Attorney General Pam Bondi, two different immigration courts in 2019 competed but allowed him to remain conditionally. However, since this group is now a terrorist organization designated by the United States, Garcia was subject to immediate judgment and expulsion. Any previous retention order was annulled by the designation of terror.
Any dispute over García’s gang status became irrelevant once he landed on Salvadoran soil. Because? Because reporting constitutes a practical and legal impossibility.
Without being flinch, if not unknown, the Judge of the Federal District, Paula Xinis, ordered the Trump administration to “effective” their return to the United States in doing so, she does not understand that she has no jury about any content of how to the stories of the Taunttry stories of the stories of the Toustry stories of the stories of the toustrry tales of the stories of the stories of the stories of the stories of the stories of the stories of Tauntytry stories stories.
The United States Supreme Court intervened, offering Xinis a basic tutorial of the Law School to remind him that under the constitutional framework, the President dictates foreign policy, not the judges. The Superior Court instructed him to give “the due consideration for the defene of the Executive Branch in the Foreign Affairs conduct.” It was an undercover track in a directive.
Manifestly, the United States could try to exercise some diplomacy to the “facilitation of the liberation of García de la Custody in El Salvador”, as the Supremes urged. But that is not the same as ordering their physical return to the United States, the semantics is important, what the judges tried subtly to Xinis, which without needle in incurable obtuse.
Garro of the Court: to end the war of the district judges against the presidential authority
All this is now debatable. At his Monday meeting with Trump at the Oval office, the Salvadoran President, Nayib Bukele, made it clear that he has no intention of releasing a terrorist susing in the streets of his country, much less crying him to the beloved of the United States to the United States to the United States to the United States to the United States to the US. The judge could have something to say in the matter.
In a judicial hearing on Tuesday, Xinis continued to advance, apparently resolved to continue pursuing his own tail in a circle. If you are determined to deal with the Constitution as a collection of recommendations and judges as a mere advisory board, their wandering decisions once land in the steps of the highest court.
I doubt that the result next time is so warm.
Khalil’s deportation case
Mahmoud Khalil, a unique graduate student and full -time Palestinian activist allegedly behind the violent protests at Columbia University, was arrested by ICE and is now detained in Louisiana waiting for deportation.
Once again, his lawyers were “judging purchases” in New York, but the unfair maneuver forced the case to New Jersey, where Khalil was arrested when the lawyers originally presented their request for habeas corpus (the right to challenge the detention or deportation).
Does the Constitution really protect Columbia agitator Mahmoud Khalil from deportation?
Meanwhile, an immigration judge of Louisiana ruled that the government can, in fact, deport Khalil. This was an easy decision. Green card holders such as Khalil are defined under US law as “aliens.” They are not citizens. Its presence in our soil is a conditional privilege, not a right. According to the law, a “foreigner” who supports or promises a terrorist organization designated as Hamas can revoke and expel his green card privilege.
The evidence is considerable that Khalil helped organize the uprising of pro-hamas on the campus that implied the unmolable anti-Semitism, vandalism, the destruction of property and physical attacks against Jewish students and the application of the law.
The Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, invoked an expulsion provision in the immigration statute by stating that Khalil’s presence and support for Hamas is antithetic to our national security and foreign policy. The Louisiana judge determined that this was legally sufficient for deportation.
Khalil won to board a plane outside the country yet. Legal disputes on the first amendment and other rights of due process are still pounding in the New Jersey court. Depending on the result, your case could also reach the Supreme Court in the non -distant future.
Many federal judges are exceeding their power, but “accusation!” It is not the answer
The case of TDA deportations
The legally ridiculous arose from the mass deportation of the Trump administration of members of members or Aragua train (ADD), another designated terrorist organization. Under the authority of the Alien Enemies Law, hundreds of violent criminals were arrested and thrown into prison in El Salvador.
The liberal lawyers for five gang members who were still held in Texas flew like a bat of hell to Washington, DC, to make their “common judge’s purchases”. It was not a coincidence that the case landed in the lap of the federal district judge James Boasberg, who issued an early order to stop flights and turn the airplanes in the air.
The absurd of that order is evident. No judge has the authority to dictate the direction of trips beyond the American airspace. Nor did he bothered Boasberg to have no jurisdiction over Texas litigants. Without restrictions, he proclaimed a nationwide Kunciation that stopped all those deportations. This was far beyond its very limited district power.
In a significant victory for Trump, the Supreme Court showed the wrong decisions of Boasberg. The Superior Court acknowledged that the tasks should never have in the first place because it obviously belonged to Texas. In a broader sense, this was a sharp rebuke for lawyers everywhere who are addicted to “judge purchases” as if it were half sale in Macy’s.
Click here for more Fox News opinion
It is not that the shopping spree stops.
Private by the Supreme Court of jurisdiction, Boasberg clings stubbornly. On Wednesday afternoon, he revealed that he will move to keep the Trump administration in criminal contempt for not returning the planes on which he had no authority … in a case he commanded with no way.
You can’t invent this.
It is a pity that Scotus does not take a golden opportunity to finally extinguish the abusive habit of district judges who declare universal cauthes that affect the entire nation. For decades, liberal and conservative judges have openly criticized practice. Atacting the problem once again was not graled, and his failure to act only opened more about him.
Indeed, in a matter of days, a federal judge appointed by Obama in Massachusett issued an expansive order that blocks Trump’s effort to end the temporal legal status for more than half a million migrants from Cuba, Venezuela and Haiti. No matter what Biden has created the program by executive action, which means that Trump can end it with the same discretion.
Click here to get the Fox News application
The Supreme Court is the last support against lawyers and activist judges who are too anxious to prevent Trump’s agenda for purely political reasons. It is time for the court to increase a spine and finish the game game.
Until that happens, “Wack-A-Mole” fans can enjoy legal gymnastics to perpetuity.
Click here to read more than Gregg Jarrett