The cognizant headquarters in the United States said that Infosys has not been able to provide enough evidence to support his monopoly accusations about Cognizant | Photo Credit: GIVEN RUVIC
Cognizant Technology Solutions has presented an argument of 5 points in a court in Texas, which urged him to dismiss the claims of infosys counters in a recent judicial battle between the two giants of you. In a presentation dated April 14, Cognizant based in the United States said the information did not provide enough evidence to support their monopoly accusations about Cognizant.
Infosys and Cognizant have been involved in a judicial case in which the former has affirmed that the cognizer based in the United States was being “anti -petitive” and using their monopoly power to block the infosys health platform Helix Fromvr
Cognizant arguments
According to the presentation of the court seen by Business lineCognizant said Infosys’ claims do not pass the “merely conceivable” kingdom and asked to be fired. “The Court must dismiss Infosys’ convention for not declaring a claim,” Cognizant argued.
Cognizant said Infosys could not identify which other products are part of the supposed “competitive” markets. In this way, Cognizant said Infosys has not been able to claim that “Cognizant has monopoly power in any alleged market.”
Cognizant said that, although Infosys argues that Cognizant reduced production by not making improvements in its software and limiting the access of other companies to their patented information, “Infosys never claim to connect these actions with reduced production.
Cognizant also argued that Infosys is based on “conclusive accusations” that the IT service market for payers is specialized and represented by “few companies” as conscious and infosys, and that payers do not see generalized Ithydyeds.
The contrademanda claimed that the non -dissemination and access agreement and the provisions of more favored suppliers delayed the development of Infosys Helix. Cognizant said, with this, Infosys “has not declared damage to other competitors, but only to himself, which is insufficient.” Infosys Nowhere Alleges That Cognizant Hefoy Any Profits to Implement It is nire or mfv provisions, and Ascasvisions, and Ascasvisions, and Forgins, and Ascasvisvions, and Forecovisions, and Forecovisions, and Ascasvisions, and Forecovisions, and Forcovisions, and Forecovisions, and Forecrisings, In Terms of Use, and ASTOYS, and ASTOYS, AND ACHOYS, AND ASOPOYS AND ASOPOYS. He admits that they were “the previous owners of the software” (not conscious) who had the existing treatment course, “Cognizant said.
Antitrust case
In January of this year, Infosys presented an antimonopoly case on the anti -power scheme of Cognizant to achieve, maintain and improve its domain both in the health payroll software market and in the related IT service market for that software. This is in violation of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Law, as well as the Antimonopoolio Law of the Free Enterprise of Texas, says the contrademanda presented in the United States District Court for the Northern District of the Dallas de Texas Division, said the presentation.
Cognizant’s anti -petite scheme to stop the launch of Infosys Helix included the leading recruitment of senior key executives responsible for Infosys Helix, including Cognizant’s CEO, s Ravi Kumar (intentional, what is in the back Infossys and who and who and who and who and who and who Infossys and who and who and who infossy and who infosize and who and who and who infossys infosys and who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infosys and Infosys and Who Infosys and Who Infossy’s Infosys. Development and marketing of Infosys Helix in the months prior to its departures, said Infosys.
Posted on April 16, 2025
