The announcement occurs when the Oiea Nuclear Surveillance Chief arrives in Tehran for conversations that can revolve around accessibility for inspectors.
Iran has confirmed that its next round of nuclear conversations with the United States this weekend will take place in Rome after an earlier confusion about where negotiations would be carried out.
Wednesday’s announcement about Iranian state television occurred when Iran’s president, Masoud Peeshkian, formally approved the resignation of one of his vice presidents, which had served as Tehran’s key negotiator in his 2015 nuclear agreement with world powers.
The head of the United Nations Nuclear Surveillance Agency, Rafael Grossi, was also sent in Tehran on Wednesday by conversations that could include negotiations on which access to its inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (OIEA) can get into the treatment.
The state television announcement said that Oman will measure the conversations on Saturday in Rome. Oman’s Foreign Minister served as an interlocutor between the two negotiations of the two sides last weekend in Muscat, the Omani capital.
On Monday, some officials initially identified Rome as an organization of the negotiations, only for Iran to insist early on Tuesday that their team would return to Oman. American officials so far have not said publicly where the conversations will be heroes, although the president of the United States, Donald Trump, called Sultan Haitham Bin Tariq of Oman on Tuesday while the ruler was on a trip to the Netherlands.
Negotiations occur in the midst of Soing tensions between the United States and Iran about the latter’s nuclear development.
Trump has repeatedly threatened to unleash air attacks aimed at Iran’s nuclear program if an agreement is not reached. Iranian officials have noticed more and more that they could pursue a nuclear weapon with its enriched uranium arsenal to nearby levels of degree of weapons.
‘Like a puzzle’
Grossi arrived in Tehran for meetings with fishshkian and others, which will probably be a hero on Thursday.
Shortly before his arrival, Grossi warned that Iran was “not far away” from having a nuclear bomb.
“It’s like a puzzle. They have the pieces, and one day they could possibly build them,” Grossi told the French newspaper Le Monde in an interview published on Wednesday.
“There is still a way for Gofore to arrive. But they are not far away, that must be recognized,” he said.
Since the collapse of the nuclear agreement in 2018 with the unilateral withdrawal of Trump of the United States from the agreement, Iran has left all the limits in its program and enriches Uranium to up to 60 levels of degree of percentage weapons of 90 percent.
The surveillance cameras installed by the OIEA have interrupted the leg, while Iran has banned some of the most experienced inspectors of the Vienna headquarters. Iranian officials have also threatened more and more to be able to look for atomic weapons, something for which the western country and the OIEA have worried for years.
Any possible agreement between Iran and the United States would probably need to trust the Oiea experience to guarantee the fulfillment of Tehran. And despite the tensions between Iran and the agency, its access has not completely revoked.
‘Non-negotiable’
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned the United States on taking contradictory positions in conversations.
His comments occurred after the comments of the Envoy of the Middle East. UU. Steve Witkoff, who initially suggested that an agreement could go to go to 3.67 percent of uranium enrichment, as in the 2015 agreement for the administration of the old Barack. President Barack. Witkoff then continued to say: “An agreement with Iran will only be completed if it is a Trump agreement.”
“Iran must stop and eliminate its enrichment and nuclear enrichment weapon,” Witkoff wrote on the social platform X. “It is imperative for the world that we believe a hard and fair treatment that will last, and that is what President Trump has to do.”
In response, Araghchi issued a warning to the United States.
“Enrichment is a real and accepted problem, and we are ready for the construction of trust on possible groups,” Araghchi said. But losing the right to enrich at all “is not negotiable,” he said.
